You must mention where you saw this ad in order to get your free picture. Call me  at 1-866-461-8470www.StPatricksDayPhonesex.com

I have quite a number of clients who live with the condition of hypersexuality. Some of their statistics are shocking by many standards. One client has had as many as eight ejaculations in under an hour while on the phone with me. Another client ejaculated 17 times in an hour phone session and 36 times in total during that 24 hour time period. Both these clients achieved these very high numbers while under hypnosis. Often times these men are able to carry on normal lives, when given the opportunity to explore frantic, primal, animalistic behaviors in a safe and therapeutic venue, such as role-play during phone sessions. This is an interesting condition that can be managed, but rarely cured. I am here to help. Call me if you feel that you may be experiencing this condition.

Hypersexuality

Sexologists have been describing cases of hypersexuality since the late 1800s.^[10] In some cases, the hypersexuality was a symptom of another medical disease, such as Klüver-Bucy syndrome orbipolar disorder, or the side effect of a medication, such as the drugs used to treat Parkinson's disease. In other cases, the hypersexuality was reported to be the primary problem.

Sexologists have not reached a consensus over how best to describe when hypersexuality is the primary problem.^[21][22][23] Some researchers assert that such situations represent a literal addiction;^[24][25]other researchers assert that such situations represent a literal addiction;^[24][25]other researchers assert that such situations represent a type of obsessive-compulsive disorder(OCD) or “OCD-spectrum disorder”; and other researchers assert that it is a disorder of impulsivity. Moreover, some authors assert that there is no such thing as hypersexuality at all^[26] and that the condition merely reflects a cultural dislike of exceptional sexual behavior.^[5][27]

Consistent with there not being any consensus over what causes hypersexuality,^[10] authors have used many different labels to refer to it, sometimes interchangeably, but often depending on which theory they favor or which specific behavior they were studying. Contemporary names include compulsive masturbation, compulsive sexual behavior,^[28][29] cybersex addiction, erotomania, “excessive sexual drive”,^[30] hyperphilia,^[31]hypersexuality,^[32][33] hypersexual disorder,^[34]problematic hypersexuality,^[35] sexual addiction, sexual compulsivity,^[36] sexual dependency,^[27]sexual impulsivity,^[37] “out of control sexual behavior”,^[38] and paraphilia-related disorder.^[39][40][41] Other, mostly historical, names include Don Juanism, the Messalina complex,^[42]nymphomania,^[43] and satyriasis.

Welcoming the Olympics to my hometown. A celebration for the world!

Happy July 4

What can you tell from shoes?

Psychologists from the University of Kansas found that the style, value, colour and condition of the footwear can paint a picture of the owner's emotional, political and other vital personality traits.
It is such a giveaway that in the tests, observers who were shown a picture of a pair of shoes guessed around 90 percent of the wearer's personal characteristics.
63 students looked at photographs showing 208 different pairs of shoes belonging to volunteers in the experiment.
Each of the volunteers filled in a personality questionnaire and each was told to provide their most commonly worn shoes for the experiment.
The observers were asked to look at each pair and guess the gender, age and social status of the owner.
This including whether the owner was an extrovert or introvert, liberal leaning or conservative, their emotional stability, agreeableness, conscientiousness and openness.

"Shoes convey a thin but useful slice of information about their wearers," the Daily Mail quoted the researchers as saying.

"Shoes serve a practical purpose, and also serve as nonverbal cues with symbolic messages. People tend to pay attention to the shoes they and others wear."
"Shoes have great variety of styles, brands, looks, and functions. Because of this variety, shoes can carry individual difference information, but do they?"
"We suggest that the answer is yes," they said.
The observers did well in guessing the characteristics of the owners in almost all the categories but they did miss some clues.
They did not guess, for instance, that the most boring shoes belonged to those who found it hard to form relationships.
This is because these people are 'aloof and repressive' in their emotions and do not care what others think of them so they do not stand out in their general appearance.
This was one of the few cases where what they wear said very little about their personality because it was so dull.
Generally, people wear shoes that reveal their personality, whether they intend to or not.
The study said that some, but not many, will deliberately choose footwear just to convey a certain public image contrary to their real personality but this is rare.
Some of the clues are obvious. Expensive shoes suggest high earners, flash and colourful pairs belong to extroverts.
Shoes that may not be new but are immaculate belong to conscientious types.
Other clues are less obvious. Practical and functional shoes belong to agreeable people, ankle boots are worn by aggressive personalities and calm personalities wear uncomfortable looking shoes.
The most accurate ratings were for age, gender and income followed by their emotional stability and agreeableness.
For psychologists, emotional stability is vital as it includes a fear of abandonment, rejection issues and the ability to cope with different kinds of relationships.
Those with 'attachment anxiety' where they worried about their relationships, tended to have brand new and well kept shoes.
This may be because they worry so much about their appearance and what others may think of them.
Liberal thinkers, who many think of as sandal wearing hippies, did not surprise. They really do wear scruffier and less expensive shoes, said the research.
The study has been published in the Journal of Research in Personality.